<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Priori Traits?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tychoish.com/2006/02/a-priori-traits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tychoish.com/2006/02/a-priori-traits/</link>
	<description>now without a net</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dad/Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.tychoish.com/2006/02/a-priori-traits/#comment-719</link>
		<dc:creator>Dad/Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 13:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tychoish.com/2006/02/a-priori-traits/#comment-719</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps now is the time to enlist you in the battle against essentialism and pass on the legacy of field biology.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So, dabble in Mayr's &lt;em&gt;Growth of Biological Thought&lt;/em&gt; (the opening 150 pages make the methodological points).  See Marston Bates's &lt;em&gt;The Nature of Natural History&lt;/em&gt;.  Think about Aristotle as a biologist.  Look at Anderson's &lt;em&gt;Plants, Man and Life&lt;/em&gt; in methodolgical terms (the last chapter is the explicit summation, but it permeates the whole book.  He too gravitated to anthropology as part of the maize work.).  Think about how taxonomists think about their groups, so read about species but also genus, family, order, etc.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Celebrate the variation of french-fries or whatever.  That's what we have.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It would work so well.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps now is the time to enlist you in the battle against essentialism and pass on the legacy of field biology.</p>
<p>So, dabble in Mayr&#8217;s <em>Growth of Biological Thought</em> (the opening 150 pages make the methodological points).  See Marston Bates&#8217;s <em>The Nature of Natural History</em>.  Think about Aristotle as a biologist.  Look at Anderson&#8217;s <em>Plants, Man and Life</em> in methodolgical terms (the last chapter is the explicit summation, but it permeates the whole book.  He too gravitated to anthropology as part of the maize work.).  Think about how taxonomists think about their groups, so read about species but also genus, family, order, etc.</p>
<p>Celebrate the variation of french-fries or whatever.  That&#8217;s what we have.</p>
<p>It would work so well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.372 seconds -->
