note to self: remember that your intention for this site was as a place where you could write notes to yourself. look how you’re now trying to write a blog? what up with that?
more note to self: write something about attention spans, reading media, length, and the internet.
note to readers: have a great weekend!
So I totally got a comment from jared over on TealArt, I think mostly trying to recruit me for his Deleuze blog-carnival (which I’m totally onboard with), but it was nice. He has a good blog, for those of you who are interested in the Deleuze1 
Actually I’m really impressed with it, and I kind of want to steal him and make him write for TealArt; the scary thing is that I’m only half kidding about that. We’re going to be at the same institution next school year, which would be cool.
The internet can be a small place sometimes.
Notes:
-
I think the ironic definite article is particularly well played here. don’t get your Strunk and White out and we’ll be ok. ↩
a couple of things have come across my proverbial desk1 this week regarding cyberpunk, and so I’ve been milling over the punk part of “cyberpunk” in an attempt to understand where the genre and ideas have gone in the last say…. 10 years.
The thing is that the geeks turned out to be yuppies, not punks, and I think the internet is largely shapped by this. Even the quasi-legal spheres of the interent (eg. bit torrent), are pretty yuppie and not very punky. Not that I’m a punk, really, but I think about these things.
Anyway, all this to say that I’ve found some interesting contemporary punky SF, which has caused me to think about these things again.
Good (not so) clean fun!
Notes:
-
and let me tell you, it’s nothing but proverbial… heh, I think I have a new name for the blog. ↩
Wonder what this “Station Keeping” thing that I keep talking about is? Wonder no longer. Here’s a description of the project that I wrote in an email that I”m kind of fond off.
Station Keeping. Basically what I’m trying to do is create a framework for an ongoing science fiction serial story, to be posted as part of a blog at TealArt (www.tealart.com but more specifically, www.tealart.com/hanm.) It’s set in a distant future, on a space station, in the middle of a hot political situation, but mostly focuses on a diverse group of characters as history happens around them, and there’ll be little adventures with cyberpunk themes, post-colonial themes, and whatever strikes our fancy, I guess… It’s not a novel, or a specific long-form book, just fun little glimpses and adventures in another world built around common characters, themes, situations, and dynamics.
In part my goal is to have fun writing science fiction in a more casual situation, and in part it’s experiment with using blogging as a medium for Sci-Fi and story telling; but more practically, it’s also a way for writers to experiment in a safe space (in part because the entries are short: 1k at the very top, more like 600-700), and it presents a structured way to form a writing community that I think could be really helpful to the group process.
The great thing is that we’re accepting submissions. If you want to write an episode, or if you want to join the writing team, you can. It’s great practice, and I think we have a cool community, so please contact me if you’re at all interested.
Until this point in the series, my titles have been somewhat more… creative, “primitive territorial machine” is simply the title of the division of the book that I’ve selected this weeks’ quotes from. This larger section is about, I think, the development/emergence of “oedipus” (and capitalism, too I suppose) but really it’s all about the development of culture and civilization. That’s my read anyway.
While this isn’t exactly chicklit, or all purpose op/ed writing, I think there’s something interesting here, and it’s my hope to make this pretty accessible to everyone. So if something isn’t clear, call me on it. If you want more resources, ask. If you completely disagree with my interpretation of a quote, I welcome it. My selections only reflect what catches my eye, and I claim no impartiality.
I ran across this piece on Lavral Subjects called “Schizoanalysis in Practice,” and I think it is helpful in situating Anti-Oedipus in the appropriate intellectual context.
With all that said on to this week’s attempt:
The first quote I have is kind of pithy, but it reiterates a concept that I talked about before:
“..it is in order to function that a social machine must not function well” (151).
The idea that functioning is dependent on not-functioning. It’s a cheep shot, but I suspect that we can account some of the enduring popularity of Freudian theory itself to this basic principal. Somewhat more seriously, on an ethical level, as Foucault instructs us to read this book, the theme is about enduring contradiction and all that.
As I wrote the above words, I realize how incredibly pomo and 1990s this all sounds. Which I suppose is the point. While I still believe it, I think it’s interesting how this sort of sounds dated, or at least tried.
On to less pithy sections:
“The death of a social machine has never been heralded by a disharmony or a dysfunction; on the contrary, social machines make a habit of feeding on the contradictions they give rise to, on the crises they provoke, on the anxieties they engender, and on the infernal operations they regenerate. Capitalism has learned this, and has ceased doubting itself, while even socialists have abandoned the belief in the possibility of capitalism’s natural death by attrition. No one has ever died from contradictions. and the more it schizophrenizes, the better it works, the American way” (151; emphasis added).
I think this passage speaks for itself, so I won’t bother, and I think this point is well made. I add the emphasis, not because I think it’s a particularly powerful conclusion, or central to the passage, but simply to highlight the ways that this book can induce a chuckle here and there.
Lest you think that AO is all fun and games, and relatively low on trips through psychoanalyic land, don’t be fooled by excerpts, I’ve chosen well… So if you get a copy of the book and start following along with me, don’t tell me I didn’t warn you.
“…And isn’t that also what Oedipus, the fear of incest, is all about: the fear of a decoded flow… It is the thing, the unnamable, the generalized decoding of flows that reveals up a contrario the secret of all these formations, coding the flows, and even overcoding them, rather than letting anything escape coding” (153).
I talked about this passage a few weeks ago, and after I had prattled on about “flows” and “decoding” for a few minutes I paused to take a sip of water, and promptly realized how absurd it all sounded. At the same time, while I’m convinced, I’m not sure how directly applicable I can make this out to be, and that was my initial goal of these essays. I think that it speaks to our propensity to make meaning, to over explain coincidence, and to construct representational models based on insufficient data. In away they sort of say that Oedipus is about needing a good story to explain this disorganized “schizoid” series of events and situations.
That’s my gloss anyway, what’s yours?
Cheers, tycho
- home
- email tycho
- about tychoish
- Knitting
tychoish
Search
tags
academia Announcements anthropology comedy dance fives hypertext interwebs journal knitting latvian dreaming lists media meme memes momtron observations productivity quotes reading science fiction space spinning tea technology the queer travel writingarchives
- Daily Grind
- Headphones
- Latvian Dreaming Status 1
- Tea Review: Ahmad English Tea No. 1
- Frugality
- Yep, Still Alive–Anniversaries
- Quickly Wiking Again
- Guesting Around
- Strategies for Upsizing
- Tea Review: Yorkshire Tea
- In Sickness
- Progress and Increasing
- Your field is…
- Spinning News
- Cardigan Modifications
- Of Stains and Yarn
- Casting on Fewer Stitches
- Refactoring and Linear Production
- The Bottom Edge
- Up and Coming
recently